Course Part 1

 
 

Part 1: Introduction to Scientific Paranormal Investigation

Welcome to the first in my ten-part series of mini-lessons on paranormal investigation. I’m offering this series as a way to introduce the basics of scientific paranormal to the world, and help people distinguish scientific investigation from the less-than-scientific ghost and paranormal investigations seen on television. Why You? This course is designed to be useful to a variety of people with different interests. First, for would-be paranormal investigators, those who have read about the world’s strange mysteries and want to try their hand at it, this is a “how to” guide for conducting successful scientific investigations into “unexplained” phenomenon. Millions of people watch paranormal-themed television shows on everything from ghosts to psychic detectives, monsters to crop circles, not realizing that they are seeing entertainment instead of actual investigation. Reading these lessons won’t make you a scientific paranormal investigator, any more than reading a book on car repair makes you a mechanic. But it will give you insight into the process and a solid blueprint to work from. For people with some knowledge of skepticism and an interest in the paranormal—but who don’t necessarily have the time, inclination, or ability to become a paranormal investigator themselves—the collection of illustrative case studies will be of interest. After all, there’s only a handful of people in the world who seriously investigate the unexplained. For the millions who have an interest in the paranormal but who are not necessarily familiar with what skeptics are or what they do, I provide an understanding of skepticism and how science can be applied to modern mysteries and the paranormal. People are often surprised to learn that paranormal phenomena can be—and indeed has been—subjected to solid scientific analysis. Understanding skepticism will make you a better critical thinker. The principles of skepticism and investigation apply far beyond exotic topics like ghosts and monsters; they will help you spot logical fallacies and faulty arguments in all areas. Why Me? Maybe you’re wondering what expertise I have in paranormal investigation. What gives me any credibility? It’s a fair question, and one that I welcome. There are thousands of people in the world who call themselves paranormal investigators, ghost hunters, or something similar. Paranormal investigation requires no certificate; anyone can do it with no training, knowledge, or expertise whatsoever. Whether they are effective or not—or actually solve any mysteries—is another matter entirely. There are even some “ghost hunter” or “paranormal investigation” books claiming to instruct readers on how to look into ghosts and the supernatural. The problem is that, with a few exceptions, few of the authors have any background in logic, investigation, or science. They do not use good investigative techniques, nor do they use good science. In short, most “experts” on the paranormal have little if any credibility; they are simply folks who have an interest in the topics and have decided to write books that mostly ignore the skeptical, rational explanations in favor of mystery-mongering. Readers should research the author(s) to evaluate their credibility and history of successful investigation and solved mysteries. If you are going to buy a book or take a course on paranormal investigation, you deserve to have an author or instructor who knows what he or she is talking about. I’ve written seven books on science literacy, media literacy, lake monsters, chupacabras, and of course a book titled Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries. I have a strong background in science, a bachelor’s degree in psychology, and a master's degree in education. The first two ground me in the scientific methods and logic; the latter gives me expertise in the psychological processes that underlie reports of nearly all unexplained phenomenon. The second is my background as an investigator with the non-profit educational organization The Committee for Scientific Inquiry, founded by top scientists such as Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov. I have also served as managing (now deputy) editor for the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer since 1998. Third, I have over a decade of personal experience in investigating everything from miracles to crop circles to psychics and lake monsters. Unlike well-meaning amateurs, investigating the paranormal is not a hobby or lark for me; it is a career. My books and investigation techniques are even taught in critical thinking courses at colleges and universities in Washington and California. I also teach investigation workshops at conferences across the country. Perhaps most importantly, the results speak for themselves. I have solved dozens of mysteries using these methods and techniques. I have a long, documented track record of solving mysteries, reported by National Geographic, the Discovery Channel, the Learning Channel, ABC News, The New York TimesVanity FairUSA Today, CNN, BBC, and other news organizations with three letters. I must be doing something right, because “unexplained” mysteries I investigate keep getting solved. The methods and strategies I use and discuss here have proven themselves time and again. Here are a few of the high-profile mysteries I’ve solved:
  • The Chupacabra Mystery. I spent five years researching and investigating the mysterious vampire beast el chupacabra, which was said to suck the blood from goats and other animals. It was first reported in 1995, but within a few years was seen in a dozen other countries, including in the United States. By the mid-2000s dead chupacabras were being found in Texas and elsewhere, but no one had fully investigated the mystery. I interviewed eyewitnesses, examined dead chupacabras, talked to dozens of experts, and even searched the jungles of Nicaragua for the beast. I eventually traced the monster to its origin, and solved the entire mystery. My investigation appears in the book Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore, nominated for the New Mexico Book Awards, from the University of New Mexico Press.
  • Santa Fe Courthouse Ghost. I also investigated—and solved—the mystery of the “Santa Fe Courthouse Ghost,” a mysterious, glowing, white blob that was captured on videotape on a surveillance camera at a courthouse in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The “ghost video” became a nationwide hit and has been viewed over 85,000 times YouTube, and after several days of research and experiments I solved the case, which was reported on CNN and other news outlets.
  • The “Champ” (Lake Champlain monster) photo. A colleague and I investigated the most famous photograph of a lake monster, a photo taken in 1977 at Lake Champlain by a woman named Sandra Mansi. The photo sparked the modern age of Champ investigations and renewed national interest in the creature, and was considered the best evidence for lake monsters anywhere in the world. We went to the lake, interviewed Mansi, and did experiments showing that the most famous image of a lake monster is almost certainly not a living creature.
  • The White Witch of Rose Hall. I visited one Rose Hall, a mansion near Montego Bay, Jamaica, claimed to be “one of the most haunted places in the Western Hemisphere,” home to the ghost of Annie Palmer, the White Witch of Rose Hall. Thousands of tourists, psychics, and ghost hunters (including Ghost Hunters International) visited the site, and many claimed to find evidence of spirits there. In 2007, I investigated the story behind the White Witch of Rose Hall and showed that the stories and sightings of Annie Palmer's ghost could not be true.
  • Pokémon panic. In 2001, I investigated the mysterious 1997 incident in which thousands of Japanese children seemingly suffered seizures while watching an episode of the Pokémon cartoon. Though many doctors advanced theories including photosensitive epilepsy, Radford demonstrated that the incident was instead caused by mass hysteria. Along with a co-author, my research on the case was published in the prestigious Southern Medical Journal.
The next time you pick up a book about paranormal investigation or ghost hunting, do a little research to see how many, if any, well-known mysteries they have solved. If you can find someone better qualified to teach you, with a better combination of academic credentials, mainstream credibility, research published in peer-reviewed journals, published books, and a history of solved cases, you should listen to them, not me. Seriously. I don’t mention this to brag, but because credibility is very important, especially in a field like paranormal investigation. Anyone can write a book, or call himself or herself a ghost hunter. But not anyone can bring good science to it, and show a proven track record of success. If you follow my course and take its lessons seriously, you too could make your name solving mysteries. Maybe the next time the Discovery Channel or the Learning Channel is doing a TV show about some mystery, they’ll see your work and ask you to be on their show as an expert! In the next installment, I’ll discuss the best way to approach the paranormal: No, it’s not with ghost-hunting EMF detectors or Bigfoot-ready cages, but with an understanding of what paranormal means.
Part One || Part Two || Part Three || Part Four || Part Five || Part Six || Part Seven || Part Eight || Part Nine || Part Ten